Costing is a big subject for discussion since every
company has its own way for pricing out their products. Whichever method you use is a matter of
personal choice. What’s important is
that your end price leaves you profitable and competitive.
I strongly feel that maximizing equipment utilization
is key to competitiveness and being profitable.
If volume and product requirements permit, run 3 full shifts, including
the weekends. Spread the workforce
evenly so that no individual works overtime.
If your equipment is utilized 6 to 7 days per week
without incurring overtime costs, you WILL maintain global competitiveness and
be profitable.
For example;
We have a 3,000 ton stamping press or injection
molding machine with all the
auxiliary equipment next to the machine that is needed for it to produce. Total cost $1.5M. Assume we have enough orders to utilize this
equipment for 5 days, 3 shifts at 90% efficiency. This will give us the following:
5
days x 24 hours x 48 weeks @ 90% uptime = 5,184 hours per year
|
6
days x 24 hours x 48 weeks @ 90% uptime = 6,221 hours per year
|
7
days x 24 hours x 48 weeks @ 90% uptime = 7,258 hours per year
|
I will try to simplify how to calculate equipment cost
for this exercise as much as possible.
The important element here is to show you the relevance of the number of
hours and days the equipment is being used.
Equipment cost is $1.5M and the operating cost for
this equipment is as follows:
Calculating
Hourly Rates for 1 Machine
Add
line 1 to (18 to 26) = 13.015K/year ÷ 20 Machines = 650.750K/year
5
Days
|
650.750 ÷5184 hours/year
|
=
$125.50/hour
|
6
Days
|
650.750 ÷6220 hours/year
|
=
$104.60/hour
|
7
Days
|
650.750 ÷7257 hours/year
|
=
$ 89.70/hour
|
The above shows a drop in machine cost when working 6
or 7 days versus 5 days.
Keep in mind the 4 weeks of holidays per year and an additional
loss of 33 days. (This number of days is
based on the equipment being utilized at 90%).
The graph below demonstrates total yearly hours when
working 5, 6 and 7 days per week at 90% utilization versus total hours
available per year.
Conclusion:
·
5 days = 59.34%
equipment utilization
·
6 days = 71.20%
equipment utilization
·
7 days = 83.07%
equipment utilization
Below is an example of the impact of other costs that
are greater than direct labour. In each
business case, the ratio between equipment costs, direct labour, variables,
overhead, SG&A (sales and general administration) will change.
Injection Molding
Plant
Product: Front
& Rear Fascia (Front & Rear Bumper in TPO)
Cost/Year
1
|
100K square
foot plant @ $8/square foot
|
800K
|
|
2
|
20 injection
molding machines @ 3000 tons
1500 K each
($30M investment)
|
||
3
|
3 Shifts
operation, 5 days
|
||
4
|
33 Machine
operators @ $15/hour
|
Direct Labor
|
950K
|
5
|
3 Supervisors @
40K/year
|
Indirect
|
150K
|
6
|
3 Quality
Inspectors @ 45K/year
|
Indirect
|
165K
|
7
|
6 Material
Handlers @ 30K/year
|
Indirect
|
210K
|
8
|
3 Set-Up
Operators @ 40K/year
|
Indirect
|
150K
|
9
|
4
Shipper/Receivers @ 30K/year
|
Indirect
|
160K
|
10
|
1 Quality Manager
@ 65K/year
|
Over Head
|
75K
|
11
|
1 Production
Manager @ 65K/year
|
Over Head
|
75K
|
12
|
2 Mold Makers
for Tool Repair & Maintenance
|
Indirect
|
140K
|
13
|
6 Maintenance
Technicians for all Equipment
|
Indirect
|
390K
|
14
|
1 Tool &
Maintenance Manager
|
Over Head
|
75K
|
15
|
4 Engineers
|
Over Head
|
280K
|
16
|
12 Office
Personnel (HR, Finance, Logistics,
Purchasing, Sales, etc.)
|
Over Head
|
720K
|
17
|
1 General
Manager
|
Over Head
|
120K
|
TOTAL
|
80 Employees Rent,
Direct & Indirect Labour Cost
|
4460K
|
|
18
|
Spare Parts for Maintenance & Tools
|
2000K
|
|
19
|
All other SG&A
|
1500K
|
|
20
|
Property Taxes, Business Taxes
|
600K
|
|
21
|
Interest on $20M @ 6%
|
1800K
|
|
22
|
Principal Repayment
|
3000K
|
|
23
|
Energy
|
2000K
|
|
24
|
Fringe Benefits Insurance
|
915K
|
|
25
|
Insurance – Commercial
|
200K
|
|
26
|
Legal and Accounting
|
200K
|
|
TOTAL
|
Operating Cost
|
12215K
|
|
TOTAL
|
Total Cost
|
16675K
|
Summary of Direct Labour, Indirect,
Overhead and Other Operating Costs
1
|
Direct Labour = $15 x 33(operators) = 950
|
950K/year
|
2
|
Indirect Labour
(Add lines 5 to 9 above) = 835
|
1365K/year
|
3
|
3 Overhead (Add lines 10 to 17 above) = 1875
|
1345K/year
|
4
|
Other costs (Add line 1 + 18 to 26)
|
13015K/year
|
Total Operational
Cost per year
|
16.675K/year
|
Calculating Hourly Rates for Above
(Indirect & Overhead)
5
Days
|
Number 1 + 2 of the above = 3.387.5 ÷ 20 ÷ 5184 h/year
|
=
$32.67/hour
|
6
Days
|
Number 1 + 2 of the above = 3.387.5 ÷ 20 ÷ 6220 h/year
|
=
$27.23/hour
|
7
Days
|
Number 1 + 2 of the above = 3.387.5 ÷ 20 ÷ 7257 h/year
|
= $23.34/hour
|
Production
Assumptions for Quoting Purposes
Raw
Material TPO = $12/pc
Cycle
Time = 3 minutes
Uptime
= 90% or 21.6 hours/day
Efficiency
= 90%
18pc
/ hour molded
Calculating Part Cost
5
Days
|
6
Days
|
7
Days
|
||
1
|
Raw Material $12/pc =
|
12 55%
|
12 58.9%
|
12 62%
|
2
|
Machine Rate 125.5 ÷ 18 =
|
6.9722 32%
|
5.8111 28.5%
|
4.9833 25.8%
|
3
|
Direct Labour
18.75 ÷ 18 =
|
1.0466 4.8%
|
1.0466 5.1%
|
1.0466 5.4%
|
4
|
Scrap
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
Indirect & Overhead 32.67 ÷18=
|
1.8150 8.3%
|
1.5127 7.5%
|
1.2966 6.8%
|
TOTAL
|
$21.8338
|
$20.3704
-6.8%
|
$19.3265
-11.5%
|
It’s clear to see the pattern of allocating the total
costs over a larger volume hence increasing unit margins when operating 6 or 7
days versus 5 days. As shown above,
direct labour is one of the lowest costs.
I will go into further detail regarding this matter in a later post,
once I’ve completed my recollections, as it will better correlate with present
competitiveness and continuous improvements.

Thank you for such a detailed post about unit cost comparison! I appreciate your detail and insights into the matter.
ReplyDeleteInteresting perspective when you break down the numbers that way.
ReplyDeleteVery helpful and useful on the practice!! Thank you for the detail on your explanation.
ReplyDelete